In the evolving landscape of family law, recent amendments to the Family Procedure Rules, specifically to parts 3 and 28, represent another shift towards encouraging parties to resolve disputes outside of court as far as is possible. Hopefully, the amendments will go some way towards alleviating the frustration experienced by clients when opposing parties fail to negotiate reasonably.
Traditionally, family law courts have been hesitant to penalise parties who refuse to engage in reasonable negotiation, often leaving the reasonable party feeling powerless and frustrated. The costs associated with reaching a final hearing are substantial, not only in monetary terms but also in the emotional toll on all involved. These concerns have prompted a re-evaluation of procedural rules to better address these issues before they escalate to a costly trial.
Effective from April 29 of this year, the amendments to parts 3 and 28 of the Family Procedure Rules aim to enhance the role of non-court dispute resolution (NCDR) methods. These methods include mediation, arbitration, evaluation by neutral third parties (such as private financial dispute resolution appointments), and/or collaborative law.
The revised rules now expand the definition of NCDR and place a new emphasis on the courts’ powers concerning cost orders—orders that require one party to pay the other’s legal costs. A significant introduction is the potential requirement for parties to formally document their stance on using NCDR and to submit it to the court. This not only ensures that the judge considers non-court resolutions at the outset but also empowers the judiciary to issue case management directions that promote engagement.
If parties neglect to engage in NCDR or fail to negotiate reasonably, the court is now probably more likely to impose sanctions in the form of cost orders. This adjustment aims to mitigate the reluctance historically shown by courts in making pre-emptive cost orders and addresses the critical balance between encouraging non-court resolution and respecting a party’s right to access the justice system.
The emphasis on case management is crucial. By inviting parties to consider NCDR as early as possible in the process, the court actively seeks to reduce the time and resources expended in traditional court proceedings. While the courts cannot compel parties to undertake NCDR, they can strongly urge participation, setting a precedent that may influence how disputes are approached in the future and laying down the ground for costs orders to be made if one party does not.
At IMD Solicitors LLP, our approach has consistently aligned with these amendments. We emphasise out-of-court negotiations and provide clients with practical, upfront advice about the potential outcomes of their cases. This strategy not only prepares clients for possible resolutions but also aligns with the new procedural expectations, potentially saving time and legal fees.
The amendments to the Family Procedure Rules mark a progressive step towards a more efficient and less adversarial family law system. By penalising unreasonable refusal to negotiate and providing clearer mechanisms to facilitate NCDR, the amendments aim to reduce the emotional and financial strain on families and streamline the resolution process.
As legal practitioners, it remains our responsibility to navigate these changes effectively, ensuring our clients are both informed and prepared to engage in these processes. The true test will be in the courts’ willingness to enforce these rules consistently, particularly in making cost orders prior to final hearings. Only time will tell how significant these changes will be in practice, but the direction is clear: there is a concerted move towards reducing litigation and promoting resolution outside the courtroom.
In summary, the family court system is evolving, with new rules designed to support more amicable and economically sensible resolutions to family disputes. As we continue to advise and support our clients through these changes, the aim is to utilize the amended rules to foster a more constructive and less confrontational negotiation environment.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. Please note that the law may have changed since this article was published.
Talk to us today 
CONTACT US TODAY
0330 107 0107