Advice Centre

Speak to a member of our specialist international team of UK personal injury lawyers today on 0330 107 0107.

This case study reviews a claim involving a cyclist struck by a car during an early morning commute in London. IMD Solicitors LLP represented the cyclist, who suffered physical and psychological injuries due to the incident. Despite an initial denial of liability by the driver, the case was resolved in the claimant’s favor, securing £25,000 in compensation along with rehabilitation support. This case shows the role of clear evidence and thorough documentation in claims involving contested liability.

Incident Summary

Our client, a cyclist and London resident, was commuting to work in the winter when it was still dark outside. Upon reaching a main road, she checked for oncoming traffic, noted the road was clear, and proceeded to follow the flow of traffic. While passing a construction area, she was struck from behind by a car, sustaining injuries. Witnesses came to her aid, and she was later taken to a hospital.

Her injuries included wrist fractures, spinal trauma, ongoing headaches, and psychological effects. She contacted IMD Solicitors LLP to assist in claiming compensation for her injuries and the subsequent impact on her work and daily life.

Legal Analysis and Strategy

Upon reviewing the details, a letter of claim was sent to the driver’s insurer. However, the driver denied responsibility, stating that the cyclist had suddenly emerged from a side road into the vehicle’s path. This raised questions about duty of care, visibility, and the roles of both parties in road safety. Demonstrating responsibility was critical, especially given the cyclist’s status as a vulnerable road user

Assessing Liability

• Position of the Claimant: Our client maintained that she had been following the main road traffic for several seconds before the collision occurred. Her reflective clothing made her visible under low-light conditions, indicating that the driver should have been able to see her and adjust accordingly.
• Position of the Defendant: The driver argued that the cyclist had emerged without warning, directly into the vehicle’s path. This suggested that the cyclist’s actions had prevented the driver from reacting in time.
• Role of Witness Statements: Witness accounts confirmed that the cyclist had been present on the main road for a noticeable period before the collision. These statements refuted the driver’s claim that the cyclist had suddenly appeared, clarifying her continuity on the road.

Evidence Gathering and Presentation

To support our client’s account and counter the defence’s claims, we compiled evidence demonstrating her visibility and safe conduct on the road.

• Reflective Clothing: The cyclist’s reflective clothing was emphasized to challenge the driver’s claim that she was not visible. This evidence underscored the driver’s obligation to observe and adapt to road users in low-light conditions.
• Medical Documentation: Medical records detailed her physical and psychological injuries, including wrist fractures, spinal trauma, and persistent headaches. These records provided a basis for the compensation sought and illustrated the extent of harm caused by the collision.
• Construction Site Factors: The proximity of the construction area highlighted the need for extra caution. Drivers are expected to exercise heightened vigilance in such zones where visibility and traffic patterns may be affected.

Negotiating Liability and Settlement

The driver’s initial denial of liability required robust evidence to secure a favorable outcome.

• Insurance Negotiations: By presenting witness accounts, reflective clothing evidence, and documented injuries, we built a strong case. This approach demonstrated the driver’s failure to exercise proper care, ultimately leading the insurer to accept liability and negotiate a settlement.
• Compensation and Rehabilitation: The settlement provided £25,000 in compensation for pain and suffering, as well as covering costs for necessary rehabilitation. This support enabled the cyclist to recover effectively and return to work sooner.

Outcome

Through careful case-building and documentation, IMD Solicitors LLP achieved a positive result for the client. The insurer accepted liability and paid a settlement of £25,000, which included both compensation and rehabilitation support.

Lessons for Personal Injury Law

This case offers several practical insights for managing personal injury claims, particularly those involving cyclists and road safety:

• Detailed Evidence Collection: Comprehensive documentation, including attire and witness statements, was instrumental in establishing liability. Even small details like reflective clothing can significantly influence a case’s outcome.
• Value of Witness Statements: Witness accounts supported the client’s position and challenged the driver’s narrative. Prompt and thorough collection of these statements proved invaluable.
• Engaging with Insurers: Insurers may resist liability when the injured party’s actions are called into question. However, structured evidence can often lead to successful negotiation.
• Rehabilitation Costs: Including rehabilitation expenses in the settlement ensured our client could recover efficiently and resume her normal activities.
• Representation of Vulnerable Road Users: Cyclists and other vulnerable road users face increased risks, especially in low visibility or high-traffic conditions. Legal professionals must emphasize drivers’ duty of care toward these groups.

Conclusion

This case demonstrates how effective evidence collection, witness statements, and strategic negotiation can secure a favorable outcome in personal injury claims involving contested liability. IMD Solicitors LLP secured £25,000 in compensation and comprehensive rehabilitation support for the cyclist, addressing both immediate and ongoing needs. Personal injury law requires precision and diligence to achieve fair results, particularly when representing vulnerable road users.

This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. Please note that the law may have changed since this article was published.

Call us now to discuss your case 0330 107 0107 or email us at info@imd.co.uk.