In Family Law, cases involving child abduction and relocation require swift and decisive legal action and the earliest opportunity to ensure the safety and well-being of the child. This case study examines a recent matter handled by IMD Solicitors LLP, where a father sought urgent legal intervention after the mother of his child disappeared with the child.
The father, our client, works on a split jurisdictional basis, spending two weeks in a foreign jurisdiction and two weeks in the United Kingdom. During his time in the UK, he spends significant time with his child. Whilst the father was abroad, the mother, a foreign national in the UK on a temporary visa basis, informed him via email that she was taking their child and would contact him once they reached their destination. Following this email, she ceased all communication, leaving the father unaware of their whereabouts. This was all in the context of the father’s grave concerned for the child’s safety in the mother’s care in any event.
Given the urgency of the situation, immediate litigation was needed. The father’s concerns were not only about the unknown location of the child but also about the mother’s capability to provide adequate care and her representing an immediate flight risk. The lack of communication heightened fears of potential abduction and necessitated prompt intervention.
Upon assessing the situation, we proceeded with the following legal measures:
Given the urgency, we sought to have the application heard by an out-of-hours judge at the Family High Court. However, the judge determined that the situation did not meet the criteria for an overnight hearing, given the exceptionally high threshold applied and due to some time having passed before the application was made. Consequently, attendance at court the following day to issue the applications resulted in the court making the necessary orders, activating the tipstaff agents. The orders ensured that the child could not be taken out of England and that the appropriate authorities were involved in locating and ensuring the child’s safety.
In cases like this, the court requires substantial evidence to deem the other party a flight risk. In this instance, the mother’s limited visa and her lack of substantial connections within the country supported the argument that there was a genuine risk of her fleeing with the child. The court’s satisfaction with this evidence was crucial in granting the orders to prevent any immediate relocation.
The legal intervention successfully ensured that the child remained within the jurisdiction of the English courts. The child’s safety and well-being were paramount, and the court orders will now allow a structured approach to address the child’s future welfare. Our client was highly relieved and satisfied with the swift legal response and the effective measures put in place to secure his child’s safety.
This case underscores the critical nature of swift legal action in child abduction scenarios. The decisive steps taken by IMD Solicitors LLP ensured the child’s safety and maintained the jurisdiction of the English courts over the case. For practitioners, this highlights the importance of immediate response, thorough evidence collection, and the strategic use of legal tools in safeguarding children’s welfare.
By prioritising rapid legal intervention and leveraging all available resources, Family Law practitioners can navigate the complexities of abduction cases and secure favourable outcomes for their clients.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. Please note that the law may have changed since this article was published.
Talk to us today 
CONTACT US TODAY
0330 107 0107