Advice Centre

Speak to a member of our specialist international team of UK personal injury lawyers today on 0330 107 0107.

Introduction

This case study examines a workplace injury claim resulting in £55,000 in compensation for a warehouse worker. The claimant suffered a partial amputation of the index finger on her right hand after following an unsafe instruction from a machine operator. The case highlights employer liability, workplace safety responsibilities, and the role of rehabilitation in compensation claims.

Background of the Case

The claimant was employed as a warehouse worker in an ice cream factory. Her duties included packing ice cream boxes from a production machine and transferring them to the warehouse. She was not responsible for operating or maintaining the machinery.

On the day of the incident, ice cream accumulated at the end of the machine, blocking the product flow. The machine operator instructed the claimant to insert her hand into the machine to remove the blockage. As she did so, the machine restarted, crushing her right index finger. The injury resulted in significant tissue and bone damage.

Medical Consequences

The claimant was taken to the hospital by ambulance. The initial assessment suggested that the bone was crushed but could be stabilised with metal hardware. However, an infection developed within a week, requiring the amputation of part of the index finger.

The injury affected her ability to carry out everyday tasks and work responsibilities. Rehabilitation and prosthetic intervention became necessary.

Legal Basis for Compensation

The legal arguments included:

• Employer Negligence: The employer did not provide a safe working environment. The claimant was instructed to perform a hazardous action without proper training or safety measures.
• Lack of Machine Safeguards: The factory did not have proper safety procedures in place to prevent accidental machine activation.
• Vicarious Liability: The employer was responsible for the unsafe directive given by the machine operator.
• Failure to Provide Training: The claimant was not trained or authorised to interact with the machine’s internal components.

Compensation Process and Settlement

A letter of claim was submitted to the employer’s insurers, outlining the injuries, liability concerns, and financial losses.

The employer admitted liability following an investigation. Witness statements confirmed that the machine operator instructed the claimant to remove the blockage, making the employer’s responsibility clear.

The legal team secured early funding for:

• Rehabilitation to improve hand function.
• A prosthetic assessment, including a prosthetic finger covered by a glove to assist with grip and appearance.

The £55,000 compensation covered:

• General damages for pain, suffering, and loss of amenity.
• Special damages, including loss of earnings, medical treatment, and rehabilitation expenses.

Key Legal Points

1. Employer Responsibility for Workplace Safety
   • Employers must ensure a safe working environment and provide adequate training.
   • Employees should not be instructed to perform unsafe tasks beyond their role.
2. Vicarious Liability for Unsafe Instructions
   • If an employee is directed to perform an unsafe action, the employer can be held liable for resulting injuries.
3. The Role of Rehabilitation
   • Early rehabilitation can improve recovery and quality of life.
   • Employers and insurers may agree to fund rehabilitation to reduce long-term disability claims.
4. Efficient Claim Resolution
   • In clear liability cases, early settlement provides financial security and medical support.
   • Delaying settlement may increase compensation but also prolong access to treatment.

Conclusion

This case highlights the consequences of workplace safety failures and the legal options available to injured employees. The employer admitted liability early, allowing for a swift resolution. The settlement of £55,000 enabled the claimant to access treatment and move forward despite permanent impairment.

Employers must implement strict safety protocols and training to prevent such incidents. Injured workers should seek legal representation to secure fair compensation and medical support.

This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. Please note that the law may have changed since this article was published.

Call us now to discuss your case 0330 107 0107 or email us at info@imd.co.uk.